|
I bought those books (1st & 2nd volumes)'cause the writer says he did the research with the Rothschild family consent and with the family's data.Then some "mitology" (how they knew before all the Napoleon defead is one of them)is clarified. But he didn't see what is behind some facts that may be the family data doesn't reveal 'cause nobody reveals all the secrets.How the House of Morgan and the House of Rockfeller has long ago tied themselves with the Rothschild's House.And 'cause this the Author says the Rothschild failed to come to United States. and has a lot of writes(Eustace Mullins,Edward Griffim ,etc)that say ,when and how ,the links, between those Houses ,is working since they began a long time ago untill now and how the Rothschild's House control the Global Economy.This was a great deception.I was with the Author in B&N to ask for his signature and I told about this failure to him.
al. Could Kissinger's "papers" be entirely relied on. What has Ferguson not told about the Rothschilds in his seemingly exhaustive two volume set. Likewise, glaringly absent from note are 19th, 20th, and 21st century Illuminati activities, which the family has been widely thought to be involved with. It seems that sympathetic academic interest in these elitist families and individuals is inevitable in part because that is where the big bucks for research and publishing would be, especially for a scholar who professes to have, as he says in the Harvard Magazine article, "become a thorough philo-Semite". He does not bring up the 1776 Masonic Illuminati order of Adam Weishaupt with alleged connections to Mayer Amschel. This should generate caution.
Same question on the Warburg's family papers that he is availing himself of. He all too facilely dismisses Victor Rothschild's being the fifth man in the World War II Soviet spy ring of Blunt, Burgess, et. Kissinger probably saw what sheen Ferguson could put on the Rothschild's archives as raw material, ignoring or minimising important but dark concerns. And he dosen't discuss the Rothschilds' connection with Freemasonry at the highest level, and their gift to Israel of the Supreme Court building, a New World Order artifact, heavily laden architecturally with Freemasonry symbolism. History Professor Ferguson could fill in his blanks on some vital but shady Rothschild history from Henry Makow, a researcher and writer--and a Jew.According to an article on Ferguson in Harvard Magazine (May/June '07), he is about to take on biographical writing of Henry Kissinger, at Kissinger's request. What will Ferguson tell us about Paul Warburg's role in establishing the egregious Federal Reserve, and Max Warburg financing the Bolshevik revolution.Let's hope that Ferguson can either put this and other allegations to rest once and for all or illuminate them if true--but now that he's shown his colors with the Rothschilds, I doubt that he will, either way. Is there a whiff of opportunism here at the expense of objectivity.
the book had some good pictures, however prof Ferguson not once, but on numerous occasions, claims to refute the story of how Nathan brilliantly deceived the London Stock Exchange players after the battle of Waterloo, earning $40 billion (2007 prices) in one day. A bit jealous I suppose.Verdict: Ignore the anti-semitic propaganda and the book is worth a look.
[Also see: Fritz Springmeier's Bloodlines of theIlluminati]. Ferguson, who teaches at a Northea-stern University in the US, did yeoman work hereon at least defusing some of conspiracy talk abouthow fools like Bernard Piper-Collins claim Roths-childs alledgedly control ALL things.The Rothschildsnever ran the bank of England, the gentile BaringBros. did. They are however a very corrupt family.Author Ferguson did excellent work here.
There are numerous quotes from letters written back and forth between family members that will give you a sense of their personalities. After reading this it seems that the Rothschilds were in the business of making large loans to governments and then packaging these loans as bonds and selling them to the public.
It is a little too detailed and didn't keep my interest from one chapter to the next. I have to start out by saying overall I enjoyed the book but I would only rate it as an average book.
You can learn a lot about the type of business that that Rothschilds were in but not a lot of how they went about doing it. It would have been better if it left out 150 pages or so.
I found myself doing a lot of skiming over what I would say was boring filler in the book. They were as much bond and commodity traders as they were bankers, which I found interesting.
The family history is very detailed so if this is the kind of thing you are interested in then you will probably enjoy the book more then I did.
|
